What's wrong with that title? Why does it fill me with anger?
What do you mean he "rejected" the call for Israel's annihilation? UN General Secretary Ban Ki-Moon attended the Non-Aligned Movement Summit in Tehran. That's right - Ki-Moon went to Tehran, a nation calling for Israel to be wiped off the face of the map...to tell them that he rejects this?
Honestly, that message could have been delivered from New York.
I guess what really bothers me, what I reject, is the word "reject." It is a relatively passive voice compared to the genocide it discusses. No, Tehran is not planning on asking Israelis to politely leave the region. What he wants to do - what he will do if he manages to cross the nuclear barrier, is try to blow Israel up; to erase us; to murder us - all of us.
He will aim missiles at my home, my children, my land. He will fire those missiles and really not care where they land - even if it obliterates my Palestinian neighbors, Ahmadinejad will be happy so long as we join them.
I've written about this before - but I'll write it again. Thirty years ago, and I still remember the exact words written in the New York Times. I remember the feeling deep in the pit of my stomach; the shock of going outside and seeing the sun still shining.
Israel had offered to host a conference on genocide - who better than the Jews, who were the victims of Hitler's genocidal "final solution." It was to be a conference on not just the Jewish Holocaust, but other historical acts of injustice - including the Armenian massacre that claimed the lives of 1.5 million people.
Turkey was enraged - you see, the perpetrators yet live. There was no Armenian genocide, claim the Turks, and to prove it - they threatened the Jewish community of Turkey. According to the New York Times - some thirty years ago, "Turkey cannot guarantee the lives, nor the livelihoods of Turkey's Jewish community."
Those were the words - burned into my brain. I was sitting in the dining hall, eating breakfast and reading the newspaper - I can even tell you where the article appeared - front page, lower right hand corner...I stared at it. I read it again. I heard the noise around the room and everyone was talking and I was in shock.
They just threatened tens of thousands of people - what is WRONG with you all? I wanted to shout. I took a deep breath, left my food where it was, and walked outside. Surely, the cars would have stopped in the street - everywhere, people would be rallying. The world would not be silent again!
I went outside and stood in the street and watched as people walked past me, the sun shining brightly. The cars moved; the lights changed. What was WRONG with these people?
It is happening now - Iran IS threatening Israel. We are prepared, this time, to defend ourselves. We are protecting our own - we even have gas masks for our babies. A new design, isn't that wonderful - better, longer lasting, whatever.
Ban Ki-Moon "rejects" calls for Israel's annihilation? He REJECTS them? I do not for a moment believe it will happen. I do not believe missiles will rain down on Israel but that is because I believe in God, a God who has chosen my people long ago. He brought us to this land; promised it to us. He has returned us to Israel and He has returned Israel to us.
No, God won't allow Israel to be annihilated. I know this - but Ban Ki-Moon does not; Obama does not; the presidents and prime ministers of the western world do not know this great secret of the Jewish people. God will stop the missiles - and it is likely that His Hand will be the Israeli army, our sons.
But Ban Ki-Moon's "rejection" is too mild for the words, for the threat. To be worthy of his post, he should be slapping Ahmadinejad in the face - in the wallet, and in the face. "Who do you think you are?" He should be demanding. "Do you think that the world will stay quiet this time? Never again will we allow genocide such as you are threatening. If you dare, it will not be Israel that will be annihilated, but YOUR land, YOUR country, YOUR life, YOUR government."
I don't know what the right word would have been - I know only that rejecting is just too tame a word.