The Final Fall of the New York Times

I can think of so many horrible accusations that could be written down and sent in an op-ed piece. But it is a misconception to believe that newspapers print op-ed pieces blindly. They are chosen more carefully even than the news covered on the front pages.

The publishing body can later claim that the opinion is not theirs and attempt to remove their responsibility. But there must be some level of responsibility, no matter how hard they try to deny it, that remains on them.

Some day, someone may ask... when did The New York Times cease to exist? The answer is the moment they published what is perhaps the worst blood libel against the Jewish people since the time Jews were accused of killing Christian children to use their blood in baking matzo.

Blood Libel. Nothing less. If you know anything about Judaism, you would know we don't eat blood (never mind the fact that we don't kill Christian children...if only the same could be said in relation to others murdering our children). And OMG, we don't train dogs to rape anyone...dear God, Above us, help us understand the hate that lies in their warped minds. Who thinks this stuff up?

Untold numbers of Jews have been murdered based on all these lies. God knows how many will suffer or be endangered by the The New York Times' latest disgrace.

The day before the truth of October 7 was FINALLY published, a lie was spread. Coincidence? Unlikely.

You want to tell me that a major, huge story confirming details of something that started more than two years ago and ended only a short time ago...wasn't planned in advance until they'd put together the paper from the previous day? Publishing doesn't work that way. Upper management, heads of departments knew the story of sexual torture, systematic rape and mutilation, barbarity upon barbarity was about to be made public. FINALLY.

And so it would come about that one day before that a horrific report was published, the Times would choose to print a story of abomination and horror. An accusation that Israel had trained dogs to rape Arab women.

A lie has power. The accusation was made. No proof offered. None offered because there is none. I am struggling to even write the words they published. For almost all my life, I have had dogs. I was born into a family with a Schnapsie dachshund and continue the tradition with my beloved Sushi. I don't even know if it is physically possible to train an animal to do that. Animals other than humans.

But what is fascinating in this article is the last lines of the paragraph in this image.

Look, whether you consider yourself pro-Israeli or pro-Palestinian, here’s one thing we should be able to agree on: We’re anti-rape. The horrific abuse inflicted on Israeli women on Oct. 7 now happens to Palestinians day after day after day.

It is an admission and a denial in one. We should all be anti-rape, says Nicholas Donabet Kristof. He has no problem using the word rape when he falsely accuses Israeli soldiers. But when referring to documented (unlike his accusations) cases of rape, gang-rape, rape of dead bodies, rape of a woman as she is being murdered, all of these and more are demeaned to "abuse inflicted".

The outrages in this "op-ed" piece continue. The dog reference, which has blown up in the faces of the Times is actually only one idiotic sentence, "One journalist said he had been held down and raped by a dog, a claim backed by other accounts from prisoners who report they underwent the same thing."

The final accusation actually brings some comic relief. Good old Nicholas is on a roll. He now has the audacity to lecture the US because, after all, "The United States has leverage". So, he wants the us to do "demand that Red Cross visits be restored for Palestinian detainees." Anyone remember Nicholas Donabet Kristof demanding the Red Cross visit the Israeli hostages? Yeah, me neither.

On October 7, when monsters invaded our land, the savages came with the knowledge of who lived where, how many people in each house, if there was a dog. The invaders murdered the dogs, sometimes even before they murdered the people...because loved dogs protect their owners. They shot Tony and then took a young mother, her 9-month-old baby and her 4-year-old son who loved Batman. They were murdered barbarically. Shiri Bibas. Kfir Bibas. Ariel Bibas. And Tony, their much loved family pet.

The savages that came in and murdered 1200 people in a single day of blood and horror systematically raped and tortured. The horror of that day still brings us to our knees in agony.

The fact is that on the day before these horrors were truly released, an absurd 2 years, 7 months, 5 days (947 days) after it happened, the New York Times committed its own abomination. They fed a lie to their readers. Proof of the horrors of October 7 were offered from the very first day. Of the blood libel, no proof was offered, can be offered.

The juxtaposition of the blood libel and, finally, the true barbarism of the sadistic actions of the terrorists on October 7 cannot possibly be a coincidence, an accident.

And it is this juxtaposition that dooms the New York Times. No apology on page 56 will suffice. To be honest, no apology, even on page 1, will help.

It is time for the New York Times to close its doors. There is no news left fit to print in a world destroyed by lies. There is no return from the vile accusations being made about our soldiers, our country, our people.

We are so stupidly naive. We believed if we tell you what they did, you will be as horrified as we are. We thought the same in 1945. We built museums to show you, websites to educate you.

And the truth comes slowly. You can't educate hate. The stupid world still has not learned that, invariably, what they accuse Israel of doing is what they themselves have done.

So it is with rape, so it is with murder. So it is with genocide and war crimes. The ground in Europe is soaked in our blood and the grounds below the New York Times is soaked in lies.

The State of Israel and the Jewish people of the world must demand the immediate resignation of the entire staff of the New York Times. There is nothing left fit to print once a newspaper has destroyed all its credibility.

Cancel your subscription. Don't ever buy it again. Demand the end.

There is no New York Times...it was, it turns out, the final one to fall from the October 7 massacre.